<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overheard on Twitter: Imagine That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/</link>
	<description>Because when you&#039;re presenting, someone&#039;s always watching.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Potts</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/?p=668#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#039;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#039;m cheating when I post them. It&#039;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#039;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#39;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#39;m cheating when I post them. It&#39;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#39;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Potts</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/?p=668#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#039;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#039;m cheating when I post them. It&#039;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#039;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#39;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#39;m cheating when I post them. It&#39;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#39;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Potts</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/?p=668#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#039;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#039;m cheating when I post them. It&#039;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#039;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and commenting Jeff. Glad you like what I&#39;m doing here in general and the Twitter posts specifically. I always feel a little bit like I&#39;m cheating when I post them. It&#39;s hard to resist though because each one is a narrative in miniature starkly expressing the angst of presentation disaster.  Questions for you: I&#39;ve done the Twitter posts in three formats. Multiple tweets sharing a general theme with no commentary, one tweet with no commentary and one tweet with commentary. Which do you think is most useful/effective? Is just the post enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/2008/11/15/overheard-on-twitter-imagine-that/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingmurphyslaw.com/?p=668#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is fascinating. You are able to choose a topic and then get a snapshot of what people think about it. I really enjoy these Twitter vignette posts. Keep&#039;em coming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the blog. It is always enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>Twitter is fascinating. You are able to choose a topic and then get a snapshot of what people think about it. I really enjoy these Twitter vignette posts. Keep&#39;em coming.</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog. It is always enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
